CAUTION is recommended
in relying upon
the information contained on this site. See disclaimer
.
Carney, Sugai & Sudweeks Our Practice Publications New Laws For New Clients Site Map Contact Us Home
 

NOTES and Updates - Spring 2002  

In THIS ISSUE
Federal Tax Law Changes
  Increase in Gift Tax Exclusion
  Increase in Estate Tax Exemption
California Law Changes
  Premarital Agreements
  Wendland Case
  Enforcement of Elder Abuse
Elder Law
  Fraud Alert
  Prescription Drug Alert
  Elder Law Corner

The season of renewal has arrived! As Teale put it, "The world's favorite season is Spring, when all things seem possible," and we at Carney Law Firm couldn't agree more. With a successful US Olympics behind us, sunny days ahead and terrific clients like you, all things do seem possible–and we look forward to continuing to meet your legal needs in the months and years to come.

CLIENT SEMINAR
May 9, 7:00 p.m.
"Trust Administration: What to Do After Your Loved One Dies"

While you're visiting our web site we hope you will come and sign our guestbook. Get to know us better by reading our history, mission statement and bios; or find out more about probate, estate planning, conservatorship and elder law, including Medi-Cal planning. You can even peruse past newsletters, take advantage of client alerts, or get up to speed on new statutes and rulings. We feel good about our site, and we hope you will too. Don't hesitate to visit our client endorsement page, where you can add your own comments, if you like. Suggestions about the site itself are also welcome.

We announce with regret the departure of paralegal Judith Easter from our midst. Judy has relocated to her "dream home" in Oregon, and the entire firm wishes her well.

Our Spring seminar:
"Trust Administration: What to Do After Your Loved One Dies," is scheduled for May 9, 2002. Grieving is a difficult process in itself, and a clear understanding of trust administration and what it entails can make the inherently stressful months following a death more manageable. Please feel free to bring friends and family members; what you learn now can minimize errors and confusion later.


One of the most overlooked areas of opportunity for estate tax planning is the area of annual gifting. The annual gift tax exclusion amount has risen to $11,000 per person. For clients needing to reduce the size of their estate for estate tax purposes, current annual gifting can provide an easy and gift-tax-free method of estate tax planning. For example, gifting can be combined with education savings plans for a child or grandchild. Using one of the new educational gifting options, including 529 plans, Education IRA's and others (as reported in a prior issue of our newsletter), you can accomplish some estate tax planning while at the same time obtaining income tax benefits. Anyone with questions on how annual gifting can benefit your estate planning, please contact our office.

As reported in our last newsletter and in our July correspondence, the estate tax exemption amount for 2002 has risen to $1,000,000 per person. In addition, the top estate tax rate dropped from 55% to 50%, and the 5% surtax was eliminated. The estate tax exemption rate will remain at $1,000,000 per person in 2003; however, the top estate tax rate will drop to 49%. These changes to the estate tax system will be beneficial for all of our clients, and some may find that their estate is no longer taxable for estate tax purposes.

For married clients whose total estate is less than the one million dollar exemption amount, we would be happy to reevaluate your current estate plan with you to determine if any changes might be in order. For married clients with estates in excess of about $1,200,000, the change means that the Bypass Trust will be funded with a greater portion of the estate than may have been anticipated, leaving the surviving spouse with less complete control over the total estate. Should you have questions regarding how these and the future changes to the estate tax system may impact your existing estate plan, please contact us.

back to top

The drafting and enforceability requirements of premarital agreements were just increased, making it more difficult to locate attorneys willing to draft such agreements. In order for a premarital agreement to be enforced, a court must now find that the party against whom the agreement is to be enforced (1) had independent legal counsel, (2) had at least seven (7) days to seek advice regarding the agreement, (3) had waived his or her rights to counsel, if he or she was not represented, (4) did not execute the agreement under duress, fraud, or undue influence and had capacity to enter into the agreement, and (5) was not subject to any other factors the court might deem relevant.

As the court can now take any components it finds relevant into account, it is increasingly difficult to rely on any premarital agreement to be enforceable. These new rules appear to block signing documents on the way to the church, require independent counsel or an informed waiver of counsel on both sides, and demand proof as to capacity. Also, under the "other factors" test, the courts will probably be looking at whether the agreement was "fair" at the time it was signed and, possibly, at the time it is challenged. Finally, and importantly, this new law applies to all premarital agreements, even those previously executed, and may result in current agreements being found unenforceable.

back to top

This conservatorship case involved a man who suffered severe brain damage in an automobile accident. While he was comatose for a period of time, Mr. Wendland did regain a certain level of consciousness and was not in a vegetative state. Prior to his accident, Mr. Wendland had expressed his desire not to live in a vegetative state, but had never executed an Advance Health Care Directive. Mr. Wendland's wife sought to remove her husband's feeding tube, based on his previously expressed statements regarding not wanting to live in such a state. The California Supreme Court found that these oral statements did not meet the required burden of clear and convincing evidence and refused to permit the removal of the feeding tube. This case has implications for our elderly citizens who suffer from mental deterioration or Alzheimer's Disease.

The California Supreme Court did not want to establish a precedent which might allow the withholding of medical treatment absent a clear directive from the person impacted. Thus it is critical, while you have capacity, to execute a valid Advance Health Care Directive and make your wishes for life-sustaining care known.

back to top

Enforcement of Elder Abuse
Recently, we have heard more and more about "elder abuse." Local cases involving prominent citizens (a doctor at Stanford, for one) who have been charged with potential financial abuse and even physical abuse, which may have resulted in the elder's death, have made front page headlines. While it is not clear from a societal standpoint whether the incidence of elder abuse is actually increasing, it is quite clear that authorities are taking a greater interest in protecting our elderly citizens, and for that reason we need to be aware of exactly what "elder abuse" entails.

There are two types of elder abuse. The first type is physical abuse, which can involve neglect, physical assaults, or assaults resulting in serious injury or death. Obviously these cases are prosecuted whenever possible; many times the culprit is a family member, a caregiver, or even a nursing home. The second type of elder abuse is financial, which can be blatant, the outright theft of funds for instance, or it can involve a seemingly innocuous transfer of assets from an elderly person's control to the agent's, who is typically a child.

For example: a child holding the power of attorney for her father gifts to herself $10,000 to allow him to qualify for Medi-Cal. Is this abuse? The answer, in today's enforcement climate, would depend on the exact wording of the Power of Attorney; but absent specific gifting language the document, the answer would be yes, this is considered financial abuse. Such seemingly innocent behavior can spark dangers in the new aggressive prosecution of financial elder abuse.

To protect yourself and your family members, it is increasingly advisable to prepare specific instruction documents and intent letters stating your desires with regard to care and financial matters in the event of your incapacity. These documents must be prepared in advance, before you become incapacitated and well before "undue influence" could play a role in your decision-making process.

So, if you are concerned about the cost of your long-term care and would want to preserve assets for your spouse and family, your existing documents (especially your financial power of attorney) may need to be amended or replaced with new documents in order to provide flexibility for your family to do asset preservation gifting if you become incapacitated. Also, in the current social climate, clear instructions regarding your wishes are needed to protect your family from being accused of elder abuse towards you. Call us if you would like to discuss this issue further.

back to top

Elder Law The IRS has released information regarding the latest tax scam to which over 80,000 Americans have fallen victim. Promoters of this scam deceive people into paying money to obtain advice on how to file claims with the IRS for "Slavery Reparations" or "Native American Reparations." These promoters advise their victims to file claims seeking from $40,000 to $80,000 in tax credits and refunds. While the Slavery Reparation scam has mainly impacted the southern states, the Native American Reparation scam may affect California as well. The IRS had previously been lenient with persons filing reparation claims, allowing two such claims to be filed before assessing penalties for filing a frivolous return. Currently, however, after a warning from the IRS, a potential $500 penalty may be assessed to the victim for filing of a frivolous return.

Please remember that anything sounding too good to be true, probably is. To report a suspected tax fraud to the IRS, you can call 1-800-829-0433.


In recent years, ordering prescription medications and other drugs from other countries has become increasingly popular. Consumers who use this resource commonly cite reduced cost and even the ability to get drugs which are regulated in the United States, without a prescription,as their primary reasons for purchasing controlled drugs abroad. According to the FDA, foreign pharmacies who ship prescription drugs to citizens of our country are in violation of federal law. A main concern is about the quality and drug strength of products outside the U.S. Do be aware, however, that the FDA will sometimes permit the importation of illegal drugs in order to treat certain patients with serious medical conditions.

back to top

Trust Mills are companies which "sell" expensive boilerplate estate planning documents which are not prepared by attorneys, are not appropriate for most of their clients, and are often defective. These trust mills operate under many different names and mainly target their "products" to seniors. Often these trust mills use the confidential financial information obtained to also sell the client on inappropriate investments. Clients are told that they should not see an attorney about the estate plan or investments as the attorney probably will not "understand." Some recent names these companies have used are National Trust Service, Alliance for Mature Americans, Legacy Legal, Estate Protection Planning Corporation, and Senior Informational Services.

Always encourage elderly friends and family members to seek reputable estate planning attorney assistance, preferably an attorney who is a certified specialist in Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Law. If you hear someone was told not to consult an attorney, encourage that person to get help immediately. These trust mill representatives are con men/women and not to be trusted.

back to top